Direct Answer

SEC EDGAR classifies Kinder Morgan under SIC code 4922 (Natural Gas Transmission). Among Swoopr's S&P 500 Equal Weight companies, 5 others share that classification; by latest reported revenue, Kinder Morgan ranks 2 of 6. A filing classification is a starting point: a company's real competitors depend on its segments, which its 10-K describes.

How Does Kinder Morgan Compare With Its Peers?

CompanyRevenue (latest FY)Revenue growthOperating marginNet margin
Targa Resources (TRGP)$17.0 billion FY20253.9%19.6%11.3%
Kinder Morgan (KMI)$16.9 billion FY202512.2%27.9%18.0%
Williams Companies (WMB)$11.9 billion FY202513.8%35.1%21.9%
DT Midstream Inc. (DTM)$1.2 billion FY202526.7%49.4%35.5%
Antero Midstream Corporation (AM)$1.2 billion FY20257.4%54.2%35.2%
Summit Midstream Corporation (SMC)$562 million FY202530.8%n/a0.5%

Revenue growth compares each company's latest fiscal year with the one before. Fiscal years do not always end on the same date, so treat close comparisons with care.

Bar chart of operating margin for Kinder Morgan and 4 peers: Targa Resources (TRGP) 19.6%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 27.9%, Williams Companies (WMB) 35.1%, DT Midstream Inc. (DTM) 49.4%, Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) 54.2%.
Operating margin of Kinder Morgan against companies sharing its SEC industry classification, from the table above. Select the chart to open it full size.

How Does Kinder Morgan Rank Among All SEC Filers in Its Industry Code?

6 companies with annual reports in Swoopr's SEC dataset share SIC code 4922 (Natural Gas Transmission), a wider group than the S&P 500 Equal Weight companies above. Ranks run from 1 (highest) and use each company's latest fiscal year, in U.S. dollars.

MeasureKinder MorganMedian of filersRank
Revenue$16.9 billion$6.6 billion2 of 6
Revenue growth12.2%13.0%4 of 6
Operating margin27.9%35.1%4 of 5
Net margin18.0%20.0%4 of 6

A SIC code reflects the filer's main business as the SEC records it, so the group mixes companies of very different size; the median is a better guide than the average, and a rank near the top by revenue says nothing about quality.

Where These Numbers Come From

Every figure on this page is a value Kinder Morgan reported in its own SEC filings, read from the SEC's XBRL data (accession 0001506307-26-000011 for fiscal year 2025). Ratios are computed from those reported values. Figures were retrieved on October 7, 2026; a later amendment or a new annual report can change them, and the filing itself always takes precedence over this summary.

Each fiscal year is labeled by the calendar year in which it ended, so a company that names the same period differently in its own filings (many retailers whose year ends in January) may use another label. A year is left out of the table when the SEC data set holds no value for it. A figure shown as "Not reported" means the company did not file a value under the standard tag Swoopr reads, not that the amount was zero. This page is educational and describes reported history only; it is not a forecast or a recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are Kinder Morgan's competitors?

Companies sharing Kinder Morgan's SEC classification (SIC code 4922 (Natural Gas Transmission)) include Targa Resources (TRGP), Williams Companies (WMB), DT Midstream Inc. (DTM), Antero Midstream Corporation (AM), Summit Midstream Corporation (SMC). Its 10-K names the competitors it considers most relevant.

How does Kinder Morgan compare with its peers on margins?

Kinder Morgan's fiscal 2025 operating margin was 27.9%, against a peer median of 42.3%.

How are these peers chosen?

By the SEC Standard Industrial Classification code each company files under, within Swoopr's S&P 500 Equal Weight company set, falling back to the two-digit major group when fewer than two companies share the exact code. Classification codes are broad, so read the peer list as a screen, not a verdict.

How does Kinder Morgan rank among all companies in its SEC industry?

Among 6 SEC filers under SIC code 4922, Kinder Morgan ranks 2 by latest revenue, and 4 of 5 by operating margin (27.9% against a median of 35.1%).

References

Related Pages