ETF Tool

ETF Cost Comparison Tool

Investment Education, Research & Tools for Smarter Decisions.

Enter two ETFs' expense ratios, tracking differences, and bid-ask spreads. Set your holding period. The tool calculates the all-in cost for each fund, identifies which is cheaper for your horizon, and shows the breakeven holding period at which the cheaper long-run fund overcomes a wider spread.

By Swoopr Editorial Team

Published · Updated

AI-assisted content · Swoopr Investment is responsible for the final published article.

Stack of Polish zloty banknotes on financial documents with a pen, indicating monetary transactions in an office setting.
Photo by Jakub Zerdzicki via Pexels

Direct Answer

An ETF cost comparison weighs the expense ratio, tracking difference, and bid-ask spread of two funds to find the true all-in cost of ownership, not just the sticker-price expense ratio. A fund with a lower expense ratio can still cost more overall if its tracking difference or spread is wide, so the breakeven holding period shows how long you'd need to hold before the cheaper long-run fund overcomes a wider spread. Use the calculator below to compare two ETFs across all three cost components.

Compare Two ETFs

Tracking difference = ETF annual return minus benchmark return (negative = ETF lags index). Use the fund's annual report or ETF.com for these values. Leave tracking difference blank to use expense ratio as the cost proxy.

ETF A

ETF B

How the Calculation Works

All-In Cost Components

Breakeven Holding Period

The breakeven holding period is where the cumulative annual cost advantage of the cheaper fund overcomes its wider initial transaction cost. If ETF A has a 2 bp spread but 0.05% lower annual carry cost, and ETF B has a 1 bp spread but 0.05% higher annual cost: ETF A incurs 1 bp more transaction cost upfront, but saves 5 bps annually. Breakeven = 1 bp ÷ 5 bps/year = 0.2 years ≈ 2.4 months.

Limitation

This tool uses static inputs. Real tracking difference varies year to year. Transaction costs depend on actual executed spread (not mid-point) and market conditions at the time of trade. This calculation assumes one purchase and one sale at exactly the stated spread. Frequent rebalancing traders should multiply the transaction cost by number of round trips per year.

Related Tools

References