ETF Tool

Leveraged ETF Decay Simulator

Investment Education, Research & Tools for Smarter Decisions.

Set a leverage factor, daily volatility, and annual drift. The simulator runs a day-by-day compounding model showing the leveraged ETF's actual cumulative return alongside the index return and the "naive multiple", what the leveraged ETF would return if daily reset didn't create compounding effects. The gap between the naive multiple and the actual ETF return is volatility decay.

By Swoopr Editorial Team

Published · Updated

AI-assisted content · Swoopr Investment is responsible for the final published article.

Close-up shot of multiple US twenty dollar bills spread out, symbolizing wealth and finance.
Photo by John Guccione www.advergroup.com via Pexels

Direct Answer

Leveraged ETF decay is the gap between a leveraged fund's actual multi-day return and the simple multiple of its underlying index's return, caused by daily rebalancing compounding gains and losses over time. Decay accelerates in choppy, volatile markets even when the index ends flat, which is why leveraged ETFs are built for short-term trades, not buy-and-hold positions. Enter a return path and leverage factor below to simulate how much decay erodes the fund's value over your chosen holding period.

Simulation Parameters

Simulation Methodology

Returns are simulated using normally distributed daily returns (Box-Muller transform) with the specified daily volatility and daily drift derived from the annual drift input (daily drift = annual drift / 252). The index grows by each simulated daily return; the leveraged ETF grows by L × that daily return minus the daily expense ratio (expense ratio / 252). The "naive multiple" is L × the index's cumulative return applied to a $1 starting value. The gap between naive and actual ETF is the accumulated volatility decay. Each run uses a new random seed. Results are illustrative, real volatility is not normally distributed and real-world paths vary significantly.

What You're Seeing

Three Lines on the Chart

The Decay Gap

The gap between the naive multiple and the actual ETF is the accumulated volatility decay. In smooth uptrends the lines stay close or the ETF may even beat the naive multiple. In choppy, volatile markets the gap widens rapidly. The metrics panel shows the total decay amount in percentage points and as an estimated annualized drag.

What to Try

Methodology

The simulator uses a daily-reset compounding model, the same real-world mechanism leveraged and inverse ETFs use. Each simulated day, the index moves by a randomly drawn daily return r. The index path compounds by 1 + r; the leveraged ETF path compounds by 1 + L×r − daily expense ratio, where L is your chosen leverage (positive or negative). A separate "naive multiple" path, 1 + L×(index cumulative return − 1), represents what a naive investor might expect L times the index return to look like if daily resetting didn't matter. Volatility decay is the gap between the actual ETF return and this naive multiple.

3D illustration of stacked dollar bills and coins, symbolizing finance and wealth.
Photo by crazy motions via Pexels

Daily inputs are derived from your annualized entries: daily volatility = your entered daily volatility percentage directly; daily drift = annual drift ÷ 252; daily expense ratio = annual expense ratio ÷ 252 (252 trading days per year). Each day's random return is drawn from a normal distribution via a Box-Muller transform, driven by a deterministic seeded generator so results can be reproduced (e.g., by the WebMCP tool or unit tests) or, for the on-page "Run Simulation" button, by fresh randomness each run. The simulator also reports a theoretical annualized decay estimate, L×(L−1)×σ²×252/2, where σ is daily volatility, a closed-form approximation of the same effect shown by the simulated paths.

Assumptions and limitations

References