Direct Answer

Major international ETFs cover developed markets (VEA, EFA, IEFA), all-world-ex-US (VXUS), or total international (IXUS). Vanguard's VEA (0.05%) and VXUS (0.07%) are the lowest-cost options. EFA (iShares, 0.32%) tracks the same developed markets as VEA but charges 6x more, making it inferior for long-term investors but useful for its deeper options chain.

By Swoopr Editorial Team

Published · Updated

AI-assisted content · Swoopr Investment is responsible for the final published article.

International ETF Comparison

International ETF Comparison

Major international and emerging market ETFs (2025 data)
TickerFundCoverageExpense RatioAUM
VEAVanguard FTSE Developed MarketsDeveloped ex-US (~4,000 stocks)0.05%~$115B
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE IMIDeveloped ex-US (~3,300 stocks)0.07%~$105B
EFAiShares MSCI EAFEDeveloped ex-US, excl. Canada (~900 stocks)0.32%~$55B
VXUSVanguard Total Intl StockAll ex-US developed+EM (~8,500 stocks)0.07%~$75B
IXUSiShares Core MSCI Total IntlAll ex-US0.07%~$35B
VWOVanguard FTSE Emerging MarketsEmerging markets only0.08%~$90B
EEMiShares MSCI Emerging MarketsEmerging markets0.68%~$18B

Source: Vanguard: VEA ETF Details. Last verified: September 2026.

Frequently asked questions

How much of my portfolio should be international?

No universal rule exists, but frameworks range from market-cap-weighting (approximately 40% international, 60% U.S., matching global market weights) to moderate international tilt (20-30% international) to U.S.-only. Vanguard's target-date funds use approximately 40% international equity. Many U.S. investors hold 10-25% international. Arguments for more international: diversification, valuation (international stocks often cheaper), economic growth in emerging markets. Arguments for less: U.S. companies already have significant international revenue, U.S. has outperformed for 15+ years, higher international fund costs and currency risk.

Why has international underperformed the U.S. since 2010?

U.S. outperformance 2010-2024 was driven by: technology sector dominance (U.S. had Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta; international markets lacked similar mega-cap tech); U.S. dollar strength (which reduces international returns in USD); better earnings growth and return-on-equity for U.S. companies; and post-financial crisis structural reforms that worked faster in the U.S. Historical precedent suggests this gap will eventually narrow: international outperformed the U.S. from 2000-2009, and the starting valuations for international markets are significantly lower than U.S. valuations as of 2025.

Does VEA include Canada?

Yes. VEA (tracking FTSE Developed All Cap ex US) includes developed markets in Europe, Pacific, and other regions including Canada (approximately 8-9% of VEA). EFA (MSCI EAFE) explicitly excludes both the U.S. AND Canada by design (EAFE = Europe, Australasia, Far East). This is a meaningful difference: investors using EFA who want Canadian exposure must add it separately. Investors using VEA or IEFA already have Canada exposure.

Cite This Page

If you reference this table in your own work, use the following citation format and add the date you accessed it:

Swoopr Editorial Team. (2026). International ETF Comparison. Swoopr Investment. https://www.getswoopr.com/tables/etf/international-etf-comparison/

Check the figures against the primary sources listed under References before you rely on or republish them; the series they come from are revised.

References

Swoopr Editorial Team produces independent investment education and research content. Our writers and editors do not receive compensation from issuers or asset promoters. For personal holdings disclosure, see our conflicts-of-interest policy.

Corrections: corrections policy. Standards: editorial standards.